The paper examines the existing prison policy of Nepal to diagnose critical problems emerging by neglecting the need of prison reform, despite several attempts and efforts. The punitive prison policy implemented back in 1963 has dilapidated triggering some of the most unanticipated problems possessing threat to an individual, community and country as a whole. The study focuses on the current situation of the prisons in Nepal and the problem associated with it, identifies the alternatives that can be implemented to mitigate the problems and recommends the most suitable alternative that would help to alleviate those problems. The study highlights overcrowding, accommodation, education, health, employment and discrimination as the critical problems. Subsequently, it scrutinizes these problems from sociological, economical and human rights perspective. Based on these arguments, the study emphasizes on either reforming the existing prison policy, implementing open prison policy or public private partnership policy. Case studies of prison policies practiced in different countries are taken in account to support the argument. In summation, the research takes into account the policy problem associated with the prison reform and makes a recommendation to fulfill the policy gap for reforming the prison sector of Nepal.

नेपालमा आदिवासी जनजाति आन्दोलनले वि.सं. २०४६ सालको राजनीतिक परिवर्तनपछि आकार लिएको हो । आदिवासी जनजाति आन्दोलनको नेतृत्व नेपाल आदिवासी जनजाति महासंघले गरिरहेको छ । महासंघले आन्दोलनको क्रममा थुप्रै किसिमका माग÷दाबी गरेको छ । तर, यो अध्ययनमा आदिवासी जनजातिको परिभाषामा महासंघ र राज्यबीच ‘हिन्दू वर्णाश्रम’भित्र पर्ने कि नपर्ने विषयमा देखिएको विरोधाभासलाई प्रस्तुत गरिएको छ । त्यसपछि आदिवासी आन्दोलन उपेक्षाले जन्माएरको अधिकारको आन्दोलन हो भनेर सैद्धान्तिक आधारकको व्याख्या गरिएको छ । ‘सामाजिक आन्दोलन’को सैद्धान्तिक फ्रेमवर्कभित्र ‘समता’ र ‘सामाजिक न्याय’को अवधारणामा आदिवासी आन्दोलन बाँधिएको छ । यसमा इन्स्टिच्यूट्, एक्टर र कन्टेक्स्टलाई ध्यानमा राखेर अध्ययन गरिएकाले ‘एजेन्सी एप्रोज’ विधिको उपयोग गरिएको छ ।महासंघले स्थापनाकालदेखि अहिलेसम्म पाँचओटा ‘राज्य संयन्त्र’को माग राखेको थियो÷छ, ती क्रमशः अध्ययन संस्थान वा एकेडेमी, आदिवासी जनजाति आयोग, आदिवासी जनजाति मन्त्रालय, जातीयसभा (माथिल्लो सदन वा राष्ट्रियसभालाई जातीयसभा बनाउने) र पहिचानसहितको संघीयताहुन् । एकेडेमी र आयोगको माग सामाजिक÷सांस्कृतिक मुद्धाकेन्द्रित माग हो । यी माग भाषिक÷सामाजिक÷सांस्कृतिक क्षेत्रको संरक्षण र विकास तथा त्यसको संवैधानिक प्रत्याभूतिको मान्यतामा आधारित छ । आदिवासी जनजाति मन्त्रालय, जातीयसभा र पहिचानसहितको संघीयता राजनीतिक माग हुन् । राजनीतिक मागहरू नीति निर्माण गर्ने, कार्यान्वयन गर्ने र आदिवासी जनजातिको पहिचानलाई सम्बोधन गर्ने ‘राज्य संयन्त्र’को स्थापनासँग जोडिएका छन् । यी प्रत्येक ‘राज्य संयन्त्र’का मागले तत्कालिन राज्यको चरित्र र आदिवासी आन्दोलनको गति र गन्तव्यको सीमा प्रष्टसँग उजागर गरेको छ । महासंघको मागलाई सम्बोधन गर्न राज्यले तीनओटा उपकरणहरू क्रमशः जनजाति उत्थान प्रतिष्ठान कार्यदल, राष्ट्रिय जनजाति विकास समिति (गठन) आदेश २०५४ र आदिवासी÷जनजाति उत्थान राष्ट्रिय प्रतिष्ठान ऐन २०५८ को उपयोग गरेको थियो । तीनै उपकरणसँग फरक–फरक एक्टर र कन्टेक्स्ट जोडिएका छन् ।अन्ततः राज्यले निर्माण गरेको तीन उपकरणले महासंघको एउटा मात्र माग सम्बोधन गरेको छ । महासंघले गरेका माग र राज्यले उपयोग गरेका उपकरणको सैद्धान्तिक आधारलाई ‘पोलिसी रिसर्च’को सन्दर्भसँग जोडेर यो लेखमा परिचर्चा गरिएको छ ।

Promoting people’s participation in local development efforts has been accepted and hailed by governments in developing countries as the most effective approach towards empowering communities that exist at the periphery of the power centre. Participation-based approach to local development is seen as the ideal way to empowering communities and marginalized groups that are part of these communities. In the case of Nepal, government and non-government agencies have designed their development strategies based on the model of participation-based development. So far majority of the development project reports and academic research have mostly upheld the concept of participation-based development as the prescriptive solution to development challenges. Very rarely do we find a critical review of the participatory based development model that is so widely applied. Therefore, this paper aims to tackle the very concept of participation-based development at the local level in order to assess whether the claims behind this concept as being fitting to Nepal’s development approach are actually true. It analyses three specific claims that are hailed as positive outcomes of the participation-based approach and compares it to the actual practices that exist in the grass root level to see whether these claims can be supported by the evidence found. The policy paper aims to highlight various factors that related agencies involved in local development must take into consideration when applying the concept of participation to development interventions. This paper also aims to provide insight into how communities are perceived by external agents and how this perception needs to be challenged in order to make local development strategies in the future more effective.

addresses issues linked to the implementation of 10% of capital grant allocated to women specific programs by the Ministry of Federal and Local Development (MoFALD). It emphasizes the fact that shortfalls in accountability has led to a failure in ensuring the effective implementation of the allocated funds in needed areas. It not only aims to assess and analyze the level of participation of the desired beneficiaries in women specific development, but also actor- forum accountability relationship in implementation of particular grants. The paper argues that a proper institutional mechanism that is rigorous in establishing checks and balances is essential towards ensuring accountability in implementation of the policy to achieve the desired results.
Despite the existence of relevant guidelines, acts and directives to regulate target specific grants and the presence of accountability mechanisms to hold local government accountable, it is not evident that they are being observed or implemented as directed. The existing accountability framework involves quest for dialogue, set of procedures but does not imply right to impose sanction; an important dimension in accountability framework This paper analyses and assesses the existing accountability framework to implement the Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) strategy and it also looks at the relationship between institutional mechanisms, implementing agents and role of stakeholders in practice. The argument of the paper is made after extensive review of existing constitutional and legal documents and is evidenced by primary data gathered from the field study. The recommendations provided in the paper are based on the conclusions drawn from the findings.